Articles

When you stop your employer from stealing from the U.S.Government, the False Claims Acts of both the United States and California recognize your significant contribution to honest, decent conduct by providing major rewards – incentives for you to do what is right and to encourage citizens to come forward to protect the government from cheats […]

First published in 1978 10 Southwestern University Law Review 13-33 [1978] I. INTRODUCTION Recent Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Bisceglia,[1] California Bankers Association v. Schultz,[2] and United States v. Miller [3] create concern about the intrusion of government into areas of personal and financial affairs in which citizens have had some expectation of […]

INTRODUCTION In Singh v. ERA (Santa Clara County) two pedestrians were struck by a vehicle operated by a real estate agent in the course of business. The agent’s broker was a franchisee of a nationwide real estate firm. The broker had insufficient coverage to satisfy the plaintiffs’ damages and absent a recovery against the nationally […]

Editor’s note: This information is provided as a service to our visitors by Alexander Law Group, LLP, LLP. Should you wish to visit the National Institute for Consumer Education, you may do so by choosing this link (http://www.emich.edu/public/coe/nice/nice.shtml). The National Institute for Consumer Education is a service arm of the College of Education at Eastern […]

Proposition 51 was adopted June 3, 1986, and is codified as Civil Code section 1431.2. It revised the old rule of joint and several liability as to general damages and imposed a new rule of partial responsibility depending on percentages of fault. The statute, like any poorly drafted initiative foisted on the public by a […]